Third Quarter 2026Market Intelligence Report

San Diego Life Sciences
Lab / Office Market Report

Core Cluster market conditions, capital activity and tenant strategy. Stronger signed leasing and lower marketed availability support stabilization, while negative Q3 net absorption leaves a sustained recovery unconfirmed.

Core vacancy
28.1%
Up 1.0 percentage point QoQ
Q3 net absorption
(215,379)SF
Q2: +121,354 SF
Signed leasing
437,771SF
19 records; up 140.9% QoQ
Reported availability
30.5%
Down 1.1 percentage points QoQ
Prepared by Miles Arnold & Chris Durbin, Co-Leads · Life Sciences Advisory Group
Download the PDF →
01Executive Brief

Stabilization with mixed signals: signings rise, net absorption turns negative

Stronger signed leasing and lower marketed availability support stabilization, while negative Q3 net absorption leaves a sustained recovery unconfirmed.

Key conclusions

1. Net absorption has not confirmed a sustained turn.

Q2's positive net absorption did not repeat. Vacancy rose from a restated 27.1% to 28.1%, and year-to-date net absorption fell to (197,224) SF. Sorrento Valley and UTC gained reported occupied space, while Sorrento Mesa and Torrey Pines lost it. Sustained occupancy growth remains unconfirmed.

2. Signed leases are a strong forward occupancy indicator.

Of the 437,771 SF signed in Q3, 95.6% carries recorded move dates after September. Lower marketed availability adds a constructive signal. The net absorption benefit will depend on when tenants occupy space, whether they expand or relocate, and how much space they release elsewhere in the Core.

 

3. Tenant choice remains substantial.

Capital and company activity cover the broader San Diego County life-science ecosystem; real-estate fundamentals cover the four-submarket Voit Core Cluster. County venture funding declined to $391.55M across 16 companies. Two IPOs raised a combined $614.55M in gross proceeds, reported separately from venture funding. Within the Core, no Q3 deliveries and one building under construction limit new supply pressure, while substantial existing availability preserves tenant choice.

Tenant advisor · What this means for your next lease decision

Compare direct-lease and sublease spaces that meet your technical requirements and delivery schedule. Evaluate actual landlord and sublandlord offers for currently available comparable spaces, including total occupancy cost, buildout obligations and expansion or exit provisions. Base the lease decision on the terms and flexibility your operating plan requires. Q3 does not establish an imminent change in concessions.

Sources: CoStar and Voit, four-submarket Core Cluster, through September 30, 2026. Prior-quarter comparisons use CoStar's updated historical figures accompanying the Q3 report. Availability is reported by CoStar. County venture funding: Connect San Diego. IPO proceeds: Voit reconciliation of reported gross proceeds.
02Core Cluster

High vacancy, with sharply different local conditions

Across 338 buildings and 20.53M SF, Torrey Pines remains the tightest submarket while Sorrento Mesa carries the greatest vacancy.

Total vacancy
28.1%
Reported total availability
30.5%
Direct vacancy
25.2%

The difference between Sorrento Mesa and Torrey Pines vacancy is approximately 28.7 percentage points.

Map of the Voit Core Life Science Cluster: Torrey Pines, Sorrento Valley, Sorrento Mesa and UTC
Voit Core Life Science Cluster: Torrey Pines, Sorrento Valley, Sorrento Mesa and UTC.

Available lab space: direct and sublease

Sorrento Mesa
Direct3,305,060 SF
Sublease610,719 SF
Sorrento Valley
Direct540,415 SF
Sublease106,121 SF
Torrey Pines
Direct799,375 SF
Sublease444,368 SF
UTC
Direct687,109 SF
Sublease18,430 SF
Core Cluster
Direct5,331,959 SF
Sublease1,179,638 SF

Direct availability fell 182,657 SF quarter over quarter, driven primarily by Torrey Pines and UTC. Sublease availability fell 47,338 SF, with Sorrento Valley accounting for the decline.

Submarket overview · Q3 2026

SubmarketInventory SFQ3 net absorption SFTotal vacancyCalculated availability¹
Sorrento Mesa8,507,833(283,519)41.4%44.9%
Sorrento Valley1,821,234+72,12431.6%34.9%
Torrey Pines6,204,328(29,670)12.7%20.0%
UTC3,995,465+25,68622.3%15.8%
Core Cluster20,528,860(215,379)28.1%30.5%
Sorrento Valley and UTC gained reported occupied space; Sorrento Mesa and Torrey Pines lost it. These differences show uneven local conditions, but do not establish building quality as the cause.

Vacancy remains elevated

Q1 2018
8.6%
Q3 2026
28.1%

Reported vacancy rose to 28.1% in Q3 and has ranged from 27.1% to 28.1% over the past six quarters. Inventory changed during that period, so the narrow range alone does not establish a market bottom.

Fundamentals

MetricQ3 2026
Class A average direct asking rent$5.75/SF/month²
Total vacant space5,777,093 SF
Q3 / YTD net absorption(215,379) / (197,224) SF
Q3 / YTD completions0 / 0 SF
Under construction466,592 SF
Source: CoStar and Voit Core Cluster, Q3 2026; historical comparisons use CoStar's updated figures accompanying the Q3 report. CoStar reports 6,408,740 SF of total available space, 102,857 SF less than the sum of its separately reported direct and sublease figures. The source does not state the reason for the difference.

¹ Submarket availability rates divide available SF by existing inventory plus under-construction SF. This calculation reproduces CoStar's reported Core availability rate of 30.5% at the displayed precision; it is not a documented CoStar field definition. Vacancy rates use existing inventory.
² The $5.75 Class A asking rent is a current Q3 measure. No prior-quarter comparison on the same reporting basis is presented. The rent service basis has not been verified.

Rent methodology: Asking rents are withheld for a substantial share of Core Cluster lab properties. Because disclosed asking rents may not represent the broader market, this report does not use published asking-rent averages as a market-wide historical trend measure.
03What Changed This Quarter

Q3 net absorption turned negative as signed leasing strengthened

Sorrento Mesa's reported loss exceeded the Core's net decline, while stronger signings and lower marketed availability improved the forward indicators.

Q4 2025
+466,594 SF
427,000 SF UTC delivery drove cluster absorption
Q2 2026
+121,354 SF
Vacancy 27.1%
Q3 2026
(215,379) SF
Vacancy rose to 28.1%
Reported occupied space declined
With inventory unchanged, vacant space increased by 215,379 SF. Direct vacancy drove the net loss. Sorrento Mesa recorded (283,519) SF of net absorption; the other three submarkets together offset 68,140 SF of that decline. The result identifies where reported occupied space fell, but does not establish each tenant's physical departure date or reason.
Signed leasing strengthened the forward pipeline
Signed leasing rose 140.9% from Q2, although it remained 25.5% below Q3 2025. Excluding Capricor, the remaining 266,770 SF still exceeded Q2's entire total by 46.8%. With 95.6% of signed space carrying recorded move dates after Q3, the increase is a strong forward occupancy signal. Its net absorption benefit depends on expansion, relocation and prior-space releases.
Marketed availability declined
Available space declined by 234,089 SF, including a 47,338 SF reduction in sublease availability. Together with stronger signings, this indicates an easing in marketed supply. It does not establish an equivalent occupancy gain: space can leave marketing before a move-in or for other reasons.

Submarket divergence

SubmarketReported Q3 condition
Sorrento MesaLargest absorption loss; 41.4% vacancy
Sorrento ValleyStrongest occupancy gain
Torrey PinesLowest vacancy; sublease occupancy losses more than offset direct-space gains
UTCModest occupancy gain; one large signed lease with a future move date

Cycle interpretation

Stabilization with mixed signals. Q3 improved the indicators of future occupancy while reversing Q2's positive net absorption. The quarter strengthens the forward pipeline, but has not yet demonstrated sustained net growth in occupied space.

Conditional sensitivity: former BD facility

A Voit property-record review reports that 318,000 SF remained recorded as occupied through Q2 and changed to vacant in Q3, despite being marketed as vacant since late 2025. Excluding that reported entry would produce a conditional net absorption result of +102,621 SF. Interpreting this as the removal of an earlier vacancy event requires confirmation that the entire space was physically vacant before July 1; that has not been independently established. The calculation does not establish actual positive net absorption. Official Q3 net absorption remains (215,379) SF.

Tenant advisor · Test the space, then the terms

Do not assume every landlord faces the same conditions. Compare alternatives within the submarket and size range you can actually use, then test how each owner responds on buildout, free rent and flexibility. Keep a credible second option through negotiations. Torrey Pines had the Core's lowest vacancy at 12.7%. Its (29,670) SF of Q3 net absorption reflected sublease space that became vacant; direct space recorded +30,017 SF. Lower vacancy may narrow suitable options, but neither statistic establishes the terms available for a specific space. Compare landlord offers and suitable subleases before deciding which concessions or flexibility provisions to accept.

Source: CoStar and Voit Core Cluster, through September 30, 2026, using the updated Q3 historical figures. The BD sensitivity reflects Voit's October 2 property-record review; the underlying records and date of full physical vacancy have not been independently verified. Reported market figures are unchanged.
04Demand & Leasing

Leasing rebounded, led by a few larger signed leases

Nineteen lease records totaled 437,771 SF, with six records of at least 20,000 SF accounting for 83.9% of the space.

Q3 2026 lease transactions · 19 deals · 437,771 SF

AddressSubmarketSignedSFTenant / recordType
4939 Directors PlSorrento MesaSep 202628,944Not disclosedDirect
4939 Directors PlSorrento MesaSep 202633,138Not disclosedDirect
11099 N Torrey Pines RdTorrey PinesSep 202634,336Avalon BioventuresDirect
6330 Nancy Ridge DrSorrento MesaSep 20265,045Not disclosedDirect
6185 Cornerstone Ct ESorrento MesaSep 20261,174Not disclosedDirect
10578 Science Center DrTorrey PinesSep 202619,361Not disclosedDirect
11575 Sorrento Valley RdSorrento ValleySep 20261,087Not disclosedDirect
11585 Sorrento Valley RdSorrento ValleySep 20266,930Not disclosedDirect
9990 Mesa Rim RdSorrento MesaSep 20264,296SomatekDirect
11010 Roselle StSorrento ValleyAug 20269,546Not disclosedSublease
11149 N Torrey Pines RdTorrey PinesAug 202648,696Not disclosedDirect
6197 Cornerstone Ct ESorrento MesaAug 20261,142Not disclosedDirect
6370 Nancy Ridge DrSorrento MesaAug 20264,955Not disclosedDirect
6190 Cornerstone Ct ESorrento MesaAug 20264,522Not disclosedDirect
6195 Cornerstone Ct ESorrento MesaJul 20261,210Not disclosedSublease
3545 Cray CtTorrey PinesJul 202651,073Iambic TherapeuticsDirect
5580 Morehouse DrSorrento MesaJul 20269,038Calidi BiotherapeuticsDirect
9625 Towne Centre DrUTCJul 2026171,001Capricor TherapeuticsDirect
6185 Cornerstone Ct ESorrento MesaJul 20262,277MileCellDirect
Total437,77119 deals

Deals by size

SizeDealsShareSF
Under 5,000 SF842.1%20,663
5,000 to under 10,000 SF421.1%30,559
10,000 to under 20,000 SF15.3%19,361
20,000 SF and above631.6%367,188
Small deals dominate the count; larger signed leases dominate square footage. Median deal: 6,930 SF.

Leasing by submarket

SubmarketDealsSFShare of SF
Sorrento Mesa1195,74121.9%
Sorrento Valley317,5634.0%
Torrey Pines4153,46635.1%
UTC1171,00139.1%
UTC and Torrey Pines account for 74.1% of signed space, while Sorrento Mesa leads the deal count.

Interpretation: signed leasing vs. occupancy

The 437,771 SF signed in Q3 forms a meaningful forward occupancy pipeline, up 140.9% from Q2 but down 25.5% from Q3 2025. Recorded move dates place 95.6% of that space after quarter-end. Capricor's 171,001 SF lease lists January 2027; two Directors Place records totaling 62,082 SF list October 2028. Five records list move dates within Q3.

Signed leases are a strong indicator of future occupancy. Their net absorption impact depends on commencement timing, expansion versus relocation or consolidation, and space released elsewhere in the Core. Tenant names are unavailable for 13 of the 19 records shown, and prior footprints and space releases are not fully known. Signed square footage therefore cannot be treated as an equal amount of future positive net absorption.

Tenant advisor · Use timing as a negotiating tool

Ask when a space can be delivered in the condition your team needs, and separate that date from signing and rent commencement. Longer-dated signed leases can remove choices before tenants move in. Keep alternatives under review, verify any remaining availability directly, and negotiate responsibility for fit-out delays. The lease should connect payment obligations to the delivery milestones that matter to your operations.

Source: CoStar lease records signed in Q3 2026 within the four-submarket Voit Core Cluster. The two floors at 4939 Directors Place are counted separately. Counts represent lease records, not necessarily distinct tenants. Recorded move dates indicate expected occupancy timing; signed SF is not a forecast of positive net absorption. Percentages may not sum to 100% because of rounding.
05Capital & Company Activity

Capital is flowing selectively; its contribution to additional space demand is not yet established

Within the San Diego County life-science ecosystem, more venture rounds and two completed IPOs support selected companies without establishing broader space-demand growth.

Capital and company activity cover the San Diego County life-science ecosystem. Real-estate fundamentals elsewhere in this report cover the four-submarket Voit Core Cluster.

A · Venture funding: $391.55M across 16 companies

Venture funding fell 37.3% from Q2 and 52.9% from Q3 2025, despite an increase from 10 to 16 rounds. The three largest rounds accounted for 58.7% of disclosed proceeds, led by Crystalys at $130M. More companies raised capital, but the lower total and concentration of proceeds indicate selective access.

Q3 2423 rounds
Q4 2414 rounds
Q1 2514 rounds
Q2 2524 rounds
Q3 2516 rounds
Q4 2524 rounds
Q1 2615 rounds
Q2 2610 rounds
Q3 2616 rounds
Quarterly venture funding, $M. More rounds in Q3 did not offset the decline in disclosed dollars. Source: Connect San Diego.

Top 10 Q3 2026 venture rounds

#CompanyAmountStage
1Crystalys Therapeutics$130.00MGrowth
2Khartis Therapeutics$50.00MGrowth
3Caspian Therapeutics$50.00MSeries A
4Prana Therapies$40.23MGrowth
5Inocras$31.00MGrowth
6Mindera Health$30.44MGrowth
7Amplifica Holdings$26.00MGrowth
8CeleCor Therapeutics$11.86MGrowth
9AlzPath$8.41MSeed
10BTB Therapeutics$5.50MSeries A
The quarter's $391.55M total covers 15 disclosed amounts across 16 companies; EyeGenEx's seed-round amount was undisclosed.

Q3 dollars by recorded stage

Growth
$321.38M
Series A
$58.77M
Seed
$11.40M

Rounds classified as Growth received 82.1% of disclosed venture funding. Stage classifications follow Connect San Diego; Growth does not necessarily indicate a late clinical stage.

B · M&A and exits: transaction value, not new capital

TransactionQ3 lifecycleValue / financing distinction
Vertex / CrineticsAnnounced July 6; closed September 1Approximately $10.0B acquisition value; one transaction
Werewolf / AmbrosAnnounced August 21; pendingSeparate $150M PIPE pending with merger
Skye / RedxAnnounced August 17; pending$125M associated financing reported; transaction value undisclosed
Crinetics' facility outcome remains unknown. Pending combinations and their financing do not count as completed acquisitions or venture funding.
C · Public market access
ADARx $446.25M · September 2026
BlossomHill $168.30M · August 2026
Combined $614.55M · Q3 2026

BlossomHill includes its Q3 partial option exercise. ADARx excludes the October 1 option exercise. IPO proceeds are separate from venture funding. These offerings demonstrate public-market access for selected companies. They do not establish a broad reopening or associated Q3 facility expansion.
D · Research funding
UC San Diego reported nearly $1.8B in FY2026 sponsored awards across all disciplines, alongside continuing Q3 institutional grants. National NIH funding commitments accelerated late in the fiscal year after an earlier lag. These measures support research activity, although the timing of funding remains relevant to program planning. They do not measure capital raised by local companies or additional commercial space demand.
Demand conversion
Capital availability and additional space demand are separate questions. Funding can support work within existing facilities or outsourced programs, including clinical trials conducted outside the United States, without expanding a company's San Diego footprint. Acquisition integration may also consolidate space. Additional demand in 2027–2028 remains conditional on funded programs creating requirements beyond existing capacity; it is not a forecast.
Tenant advisor · Connect the lease to operating needs

Size a commitment around the laboratory program your funded plan can support, and identify what would trigger additional space. Treat financing as a reason to reassess runway and flexibility, rather than an automatic expansion signal. Compare the cost of taking extra space now with a negotiated expansion option. Track the time needed for permitting, fit-out and commissioning before setting a target move date.

Venture funding and stage classifications: Connect San Diego, San Diego County life sciences. IPO proceeds: Voit reconciliation of reported gross proceeds. M&A and research: published company, institutional and news reporting. Acquisition values, pending transaction financing, IPOs and research awards are shown separately from venture funding and are not added into a single capital total.
06Supply & Competitive Landscape

Existing space defines the near-term choice set

Limited active construction does not yet mean scarce tenant options across the Core Cluster. The Core has 6.41M SF of reported availability; practical choices depend on lab suitability, contiguous space and delivery readiness.

Under construction
466,592 SF
One UTC building under construction
Near-term pipeline status
0 SF
Delivered in Q1–Q3 2026. Bridgewest remains proposed/entitled
Next potential new availability
Delivery timing unconfirmed
Precommitted Novartis project; not future tenant inventory

Prior reports associate the remaining construction with a precommitted Novartis project. Its current delivery schedule and the timing of new space available to other tenants have not been confirmed. With 6.41M SF already reported available, the immediate question is how well existing buildings meet tenant requirements and how quickly that space is absorbed.

Larger requirements depend on contiguous, suitable space

The Core contains 6.41M SF of reported availability, including 3.31M SF of direct availability in Sorrento Mesa. These totals establish substantial marketed space, but not the number of contiguous blocks a tenant can use. A large requirement still needs verification of remaining area, laboratory condition and delivery date. Q3 signed leases can change the choices before recorded move dates occur. Sorrento Mesa contains the most direct availability; Torrey Pines retains 444,368 SF of sublease competition despite having the Core's lowest vacancy.

Market segmentation by availability size · Q3 2026

Availability size<1,000 SF1,001–5,0005,001–10,00010,001–20,00020,001–50,00050,001+
No. properties43348678135
No. available spaces357070119165104
Available-space counts are highest in the 10,001–50,000 SF ranges, while the market also retains 104 listed spaces above 50,000 SF.

Context · major U.S. life-science clusters, Q2 2026

CBRE-defined marketTotal vacancyUnder construction
Boston-Cambridge28.7%2,109,000 SF
San Francisco Bay Area31.1%138,500 SF
San Diego, CBRE-defined26.3%466,598 SF
Source: CBRE, Q2 2026, market-wide laboratory and R&D properties. CBRE's San Diego market covers 28.54M SF and differs from the Voit Core Cluster. These figures provide prior-quarter context, not a Q3 market ranking or a comparison of recovery speed.
07Key Themes

Market-wide slack remains substantial; opportunity depends on fit, timing and operating needs

Three forces explain how stronger forward leasing signals, substantial tenant choice and selective company activity can coexist.

01 · Market

Stabilization signals have strengthened; sustained recovery remains unconfirmed

Stronger quarterly signed leasing and lower marketed availability support stabilization, while negative net absorption shows that those forward signals have not yet produced sustained market-wide occupancy growth.

Evidence
  • 437,771 SF signed in Q3, +140.9% QoQ; 95.6% carries move dates after Q3
  • (215,379) SF Q3 net absorption
  • 28.1% vacancy, up from 27.1%
  • (234,089) SF change in marketed availability
Tenant implication

Suitable space can be leased before a broad recovery appears in vacancy or net absorption. Stronger signings are constructive, but they do not yet establish sustained market-wide tightening.

02 · Property & requirement

Substantial tenant choice does not translate into uniform negotiating leverage

Existing inventory provides extensive near-term choice, but the alternatives a tenant can actually use depend on submarket, technical suitability, contiguous size, readiness and delivery timing.

Evidence
  • 41.4% Sorrento Mesa vacancy vs. 12.7% Torrey Pines (~28.7 pts spread)
  • 6.41M SF reported availability
  • Torrey Pines retains 444,368 SF of sublease space
  • 0 SF delivered Q1–Q3 2026; 466,592 SF under construction is precommitted
Tenant implication

Leverage comes from executable alternatives and actual competing offers, not the Core vacancy rate alone. High aggregate availability does not give every requirement the same choices or negotiating position.

03 · Company

Capital supports selected companies; footprint growth depends on operating needs

Financing and corporate activity can support programs and reshape companies, but additional local space demand depends on funded operating requirements, existing capacity, outsourcing and integration decisions.

Evidence
  • $391.55M County VC across 16 companies; down 37.3% QoQ; top three rounds 58.7% of disclosed funding
  • $614.55M gross from two completed IPOs, separate from VC
  • ~$10B Vertex / Crinetics; facility outcome unknown
Tenant implication

Capital creates potential demand, but footprint decisions should follow funded programs, required capacity and the company's operating plan.

What ties these themes together

San Diego still offers substantial tenant choice, but the decisions that matter are specific to the requirement: which spaces are actually usable, when they can be delivered, and whether the company's operating plan supports the commitment. The practical advantage comes from testing credible alternatives early and structuring the lease around the company's actual milestones.

08Tenant Playbook

Structure the lease around your milestones and cash needs

Q3 leaves substantial tenant choice, with negotiating strength determined by the space, the owner and the commitment you can make.

Concession reference points for Q3 negotiations

Buildout
Turnkey buildout packages are a negotiating reference; compare delivered specifications and tenant-funded work.
Free rent
Documented examples include 2–3 months of abatement per lease year. The amount and timing depend on the offered lease package.
Offer comparison
Compare actual landlord and sublandlord offers for currently available comparable spaces, including buildout, free rent, term and security requirements.
Source: Voit Q2 2026 report and Voit market observations through Q3 2026. Quantified examples were documented in Q2; these structures remain relevant to Q3 negotiations based on Voit market observations. They are negotiating reference points, not a measured Q3 market standard or guaranteed terms.

Lease structuring considerations

1

Early Termination Option

Request a one-time termination option around month 18 or 24 if that aligns with a financing or regulatory decision. Evaluate the termination fee, notice period and any required repayment of concessions before assessing the option's value. Compare the total cost with a shorter initial term.

2

Expansion Through Lease Replacement

When expanding within a project, ask for a replacement lease covering the combined footprint. A single expiration and delivery plan can simplify operations. Reopen the concession discussion, then compare the combined cost and remaining obligations with an expansion amendment or a move.

3

Milestone-Based Security Deposit Reductions

Propose staged reductions tied to clearly defined funding or payment milestones. Specify the amount released, timing, documentation and conditions. Prior examples cited reductions of 25%–50%; these are negotiating reference points, not established Q3 market terms. Assess whether the release schedule returns cash when the operating plan requires it.

4

Letter of Credit as Lease Security

Compare a letter of credit with a cash deposit using the bank's actual fees and collateral requirements. A letter of credit preserves operating liquidity only to the extent that required cash collateral is lower than the cash deposit it replaces. Negotiate draw conditions, expiration, renewal and reductions together, then compare total cost and accessible cash under both structures.

Negotiating considerations by submarket

SubmarketQ3 evidenceNegotiating approach
Sorrento Mesa41.4% vacancy; negative net absorptionCompare total occupancy costs and flexibility across suitable available spaces.
Sorrento Valley31.6% vacancy; reported occupied space increasedCompare available spaces and offered terms in light of Q3 occupancy gains.
UTC22.3% vacancy; modest reported occupancy gainCompare delivery condition, tenant-funded buildout and lease term across suitable alternatives.
Torrey Pines12.7% vacancy; sublease occupancy losses more than offset direct-space gainsEvaluate technical fit, expansion rights and suitable sublease alternatives.
Tenant advisor · Align lease terms with the operating plan

Negotiate lease economics and flexibility against actual landlord and sublandlord offers for currently available comparable spaces. Match the lease term, security requirements and expansion commitments to business milestones, and retain a workable alternative. Q3 supports a competitive search, but does not establish that every concession or structure will be available. Commit when suitable space, delivery timing and total occupancy cost support the operating plan.

09Market Outlook

Base case: stabilization, with net absorption the next test

Scheduled occupancy will test whether stronger signed leasing produces net gains after relocations, consolidations and prior-space givebacks.

Base case and cycle position · Q3 2026
DeteriorationStabilization: Q3 2026Early inflectionConfirmed inflectionBroad recovery

Stabilization with mixed signals. The base case is an uneven adjustment across existing buildings, with continued tenant choice. Q3 signed leases provide a strong forward occupancy indicator, but a stronger recovery assessment requires sustained positive net absorption after relocations, consolidations and prior-space releases. Repeated occupancy losses, rising vacancy and renewed growth in marketed availability would weaken the stabilization case.

Supporting evidence

  1. Signed leasing rose 140.9% QoQ; excluding Capricor, volume still exceeded Q2's entire total by 46.8%.
  2. Reported available SF fell 234,089; sublease availability fell 47,338 SF QoQ.
  3. No deliveries occurred in Q1–Q3; one 466,592 SF building remains under construction.
  4. Positive Q2 net absorption remains valid in CoStar's updated historical figures, providing evidence of an earlier improvement that Q3 did not repeat.

Risks and counterevidence

  1. Q3 net absorption was (215,379) SF; vacancy rose to 28.1%; year-to-date net absorption was (197,224) SF.
  2. Only two submarkets gained occupancy. Leasing is below Q3 2025 and concentrated in a few records.
  3. Most signed SF is scheduled beyond Q3; the net benefit depends on relocation, expansion and the timing of prior-space givebacks.
  4. County VC dollars declined; research-funding timing and acquisition integration could affect future requirements.
  5. Comparable Q3 evidence does not establish a market-wide change in concessions or effective occupancy costs; current workforce evidence is also incomplete.

Conditions that would change the outlook

IndicatorQ3 positionWhat would change the assessment
Sustained occupancy growth(215,379) SF net absorption; 28.1% vacancyTwo consecutive future quarters of positive net absorption with falling vacancy would strengthen the recovery case. Repeated losses and rising marketed availability would weaken stabilization.
Breadth of occupancy gainsTwo of four submarkets recorded positive net absorptionPositive net absorption in at least three submarkets for two consecutive future quarters would indicate a broader improvement.
Net impact of Q3 lease commitments418,641 SF carries recorded move dates after Q3Scheduled occupancy in Q4 and 205,337 SF scheduled for 2027 would strengthen demand if gains exceed associated prior-space releases. Delays or offsetting releases would reduce the net benefit.
Marketed and sublease availability6,408,740 SF total; 1,179,638 SF subleaseSustained declines would reduce marketed supply; repeated increases would indicate renewed pressure.
Capital translating into spaceCounty VC of $391.55M across 16 companiesVerified additional space requirements, expansion leases and net occupancy gains among funded companies would support a 2027–2028 demand contribution.
Negotiated lease economicsNo comparable Q3 seriesConsistent changes in free rent, buildout contributions and total occupancy cost across comparable offers and executed leases would indicate changing negotiating conditions.
Tenant advisor · Plan for several outcomes

Build a footprint plan that works if the market improves gradually or remains soft. Secure space for committed programs and negotiate options for uncertain growth. Align funding milestones, lease notices and buildout decisions. Reassess the plan when operating requirements, market occupancy or actual landlord and sublandlord offers for comparable available spaces change. A single quarterly headline is not sufficient reason to accelerate a long-term commitment.

The two-quarter and submarket thresholds are judgment-based indicators for this outlook, not statistically validated rules or forecasts. Recorded move dates indicate expected timing; net absorption also reflects space released elsewhere. Future comparisons should use consistent definitions and updated historical figures. Licensed as Real Estate Salespersons by the DRE. Information obtained from sources deemed reliable, not guaranteed. © 2026 Voit Real Estate Services, Inc.
Download the PDF → Past reports